Skip to main content

Maximize Price vs Right Fit

The highest bid and the right home for your company are rarely the same offer, and choosing between them is the central judgment of an exit.

The seduction of the headline number​

The biggest number on the table feels like the only number that matters. It is the figure you tell yourself you have earned, the score that settles years of risk. All three authors warn that fixating on it leads sellers astray. McDannell is blunt that comparing offers by price alone is a category error:

"Having multiple offers on the table is not like comparing apples to apples. It's more like comparing apples to carrots to candy bars."

McDannell, Get Acquired, ch. 6

A high offer can be loaded with earnout, stock, or a buyer who cannot get financing. Two of the three authors treat the headline figure as a starting claim to be discounted, not a verdict.

The case for "right fit"​

McDannell's stance is that the best deal is the one most likely to close and to land your business in hands you trust, not the one with the largest sticker. As she puts it, "The highest price offer is not necessarily the best one... it's about the best deal with the highest likelihood to close." She notes that sellers will knowingly take less to put their "baby" in the right hands, weighting cultural fit and trust alongside cash.

Burlingham pushes this further into a moral and emotional argument. In his accounting, price is a minority of what makes an exit good. He frames a forced, fit-blind sale as a trap no amount of money redeems:

"No amount of money is enough if you're forced to sell to a buyer you don't like or trust and to do it when you don't want to—because you've run out of other options."

Burlingham, Finish Big, ch. 3

For Burlingham the buyer's identity is not a sentimental footnote. It determines whether your employees are kept, whether the culture survives, and whether you finish at peace. He is especially wary of financial buyers who view the company as inventory: as Paul Spiegelman tells him, "For them, the company is the product. They get their profit when they sell it again, and they do whatever they must to achieve the desired return on their investment." That is a fit warning dressed as a valuation fact. The buyer who pays most may also gut the thing you are trying to protect.

The steelman for maximizing price​

Right-fit reasoning can curdle into an excuse for leaving money on the table. Warrillow's whole project is a corrective to sentimental underselling. His thesis is that "value is in the eye of the acquirer," and that the seller's job is to find and court the buyer who values the business most, usually a strategic acquirer paying for synergies. To him, walking away from the top bid for a warm feeling is often a failure of nerve, not virtue.

"There is a systematic way to calculate the value of your company—but if you're all head and no heart, you will miss the point."

Warrillow, The Art of Selling Your Business, ch. 1

Note the direction of that quote: Warrillow says heart matters because heart is what makes a buyer overpay, not because it justifies accepting less. He also dismantles the comfortable story that you owe the buyer your loyalty during courtship: "They will try to make you believe they are your friend. Don't believe them." The "right fit" buyer is frequently the smoothest talker running a proprietary deal precisely to avoid competition. Manufacture multiple offers first, then choose fit from a position of leverage rather than surrender.

Resolving the tension​

The authors disagree less than they appear to. The synthesis is sequential, not either-or. First create real competition, because, as Warrillow argues, multiple offers are the single biggest driver of price and terms. A genuine bidding war turns "fit" into a luxury you can afford instead of a consolation prize. Only once several credible offers exist does the right-fit judgment become live: among offers that clear your need number and can actually close, choose the buyer who will treat your people and your work the way Burlingham insists you will have to live with afterward. McDannell's likelihood-of-closing filter and Burlingham's emotional ledger both operate on a shortlist that Warrillow's leverage tactics produce. Price gets you the shortlist. Fit decides which name on it you sign.

Further Reading​

Sources: McDannell, Get Acquired ch.6; Burlingham, Finish Big ch.3, ch.7; Warrillow, The Art of Selling Your Business ch.1, ch.6.