Skip to main content

The Value Gap and the Profit Gap

Snider's two named, dollar-quantified gaps: the annual profit a business leaves on the table versus its peers, and the distance between the top of its industry's value range and where it actually places.

The Profit Gap​

The Profit Gap is the recurring earnings a business forgoes every year by operating below its peers. Snider, in Walking to Destiny, builds it by benchmarking a company against two reference points: the average business in its industry and the best-in-class business in its industry. The two yardsticks are gross margin as a percentage of sales and EBITDA as a percentage of sales.

When a company's margins sit below those benchmarks, the shortfall translated back into dollars is the profit it is leaving on the table each year. Snider treats this as a present-tense operating problem rather than a future exit problem, because the lost EBITDA is real money that the average and best-in-class peers are already keeping. Closing the Profit Gap means lifting margin performance toward and past the average, then toward best-in-class, which raises the earnings base that every valuation multiple is later applied to.

The Value Gap​

The Value Gap works on the other half of the valuation equation. Where the Profit Gap is about earnings, the Value Gap is about the multiple and the placement within a range. Snider defines it directly.

"The Value Gap is the difference between your maximum value in the range... versus where you actually place... And that's what Value Acceleration is worth."

Snider, Walking to Destiny, ch. 9

Every industry has a range of values, and Snider's point is that an owner does not get to set the range. What the owner controls is where the business lands inside it.

"You cannot control the range, but you can control where you land in the range."

Snider, Walking to Destiny, ch. 9

Placement inside the range comes out of the Triggering Event, Snider's baseline assessment that pairs an estimate of value with attractiveness and readiness scores. The same benchmarks that feed the Profit Gap feed this analysis, and the attractiveness and readiness scores indicate how close to the top of the range a buyer would reasonably place the business. The Value Gap is the dollar distance from that actual placement up to the maximum of the range.

Why It Is the Return on Value Acceleration​

Snider frames these two gaps as the explicit payoff of doing the work. The Profit Gap quantifies what better operations are worth in annual earnings, and the Value Gap quantifies what better positioning is worth in enterprise value. Together they answer the question of what the Value Acceleration Methodology is actually for: closing both gaps is the return on running the methodology.

The lever on the Value Gap is the multiple, and Snider is consistent that the multiple is driven by intangible capital rather than by financial performance alone. A business that builds its Four Cs of intangible capital earns a higher placement in the range and a stronger EBITDA multiple. So the two gaps decompose value growth into its parts: grow the earnings (Profit Gap) and grow the multiple applied to those earnings (Value Gap).

How It Is Measured​

Measuring the Profit Gap starts with the company's own gross margin percentage and EBITDA percentage, then sets each against the average and best-in-class figures for the industry. The percentage shortfalls, multiplied back through revenue, give the annual dollars left on the table.

Measuring the Value Gap starts from the Triggering Event baseline. The estimate of current value places the business somewhere inside the industry range. The attractiveness and readiness scores indicate how much higher in that range the business could place if the gaps were closed. The difference between the top of the range and the current placement, in dollars, is the Value Gap. Snider's discipline is to compute both gaps so the owner sees a concrete number rather than a hope.

Relationship to Gap Analysis​

This page is Snider's specific, named, dollar-quantified version of the wiki's broader gap analysis for exits concept. The general practice measures the distance between current value and the value an owner needs. Snider's Profit Gap and Value Gap give that practice two precise instruments: one anchored to peer margin benchmarks and one anchored to the industry value range and the Triggering Event scores. For background on how these multiples and ranges arise, see how businesses are valued, and for the source itself see Walking to Destiny.

Further Reading​

Sources: Snider, Walking to Destiny, ch. 9.